|
AI for Marketing: Harvard Business School’s Identifying Key Roles to Improve Performance Question Sanyin: How to build a winning team without All-Star players? Sanyinxiang You must be logged in to post a comment. First time here? Sign up for a free account: comment on articles and access more articles. Comment by Shalin Sriwardena Year Month Day I have a simple answer to this. If you are a startup (especially in the tech industry), a flat structure is best. If it is a family business, the most appropriate structure is a hierarchical structure. My answer is because of the responsibility distribution structure. Flat structure is the distribution between the same level, while hierarchical structure is the distribution between different levels. These examples from software prove my point. Michael Kattar’s article mentions this practice but elaborates.
Combining social media analytics with workforce optimization components can help organizations create teams in dynamic environments. Another clever extension of this logic is organizing teams around value creation centers rather than purely functional units as seen in today’s organizations. For example, U.S. Special Forces deploy teams of a Job Function Email List medic, a gunner, a sniper, an air capabilities specialist, etc. to respond to a crisis in real time. Applying this example to industry, you can imagine a team with members from marketing, logistics, finance, and others working together to solve a problem. At a macro level, this decentralizes tactical and strategic decision-making to the field.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad5d5/ad5d5f46f9e9f105e8ae9cd763758acc6bdc0e8f" alt=""
Decisions are made from a broad perspective in the development and implementation of an overall strategy rather than a single, large, slow functional department formulating policy and then passing it on to the next department. See Bernard N.Y. Social enterprises require more than just leaders to effectively execute their vision and strategy. It’s also about employees being able to influence vision and strategy. When I think of institutions capable of effecting bottom-up change military.
|
|